relief at the decision of the court: Tesla may roden in Brandenburg for his factory. There is now noise in the Green League.
Here can more photo: Britta Pedersen/dpa
BERLIN afp/dpa/taz | of The decision of the higher administrative court of Berlin-Brandenburg, to be cleared that Tesla for his planned work in the South-East of Berlin is allowed to grub up more trees, and has provided for relief in the case of politics and the economy. This was “an important Signal for the investment location Germany”, said on Friday the Deputy chief Executive of the Federal Association of German industry (BDI), Holger Lösch.
For the industry in East Germany, the car factory is leave a “huge opportunity” to grow along with the settlements of other companies manufacturing networks and the Region prosper.
“Ham us richtich jefreut, as wa jelesen ham that construction of the Tesla factory can be further jehen,” tweeted the Brandenburg SPD in the local dialect, because on Friday the day of the mother language. “The state government has jemacht did richtich. Tesla comes na brand Burch and with 12 000 working places.“
The upper administrative court of Berlin-Brandenburg had rejected on Thursday evening the Urgency of two environmental groups against deforestation. The decision can no longer be challenged. The clearing work had been interrupted on Saturday due to the court decision, may now proceed.
U.S. electric car maker Tesla will start production in Brandenburg-grünheide, near Berlin, in July 2021 and every year up to 500,000 electric cars manufacture. The company has purchased an industrial land zoned, partly wooded terrain. A week ago, it received from the Federal office for the environment approval, “at your own risk” to start on first, around 90 hectares of forest with the clearing work, although the final building permit is not yet issued. As the court of the Work process stopped, was kindled a discussion about the Association’s right of action.
The business need for the acceleration of approval procedures, clear Standards, and technical guidance to many of the environmental regulations efficiently, said on Friday BDI-man delete. The state governments should provide financial resources to ensure sufficient staffing and expertise in the authorities. The action of the powers of environmental groups were on the European test.
Also in one of the applicant associations, the Green League, the-of-court complaint against the Tesla factory for unrest. Members of the environmental Association called Thursday for the resignation of their top management. The decision of the court procedures against the clearing of the land for the E-car maker to initiate, not transparent, and completely haphazard concluded, said in a letter to the Cottbus a member group of the network. “We therefore demand the resignation of those responsible, and as soon as possible extraordinary General meeting of the members.”
the Chairman of The environmental Association, Heinz Herwig Mascher, rejected the criticism of the Cottbus environment group as an “emotional reaction without air”. Even the accusation of a lack of communication he would not apply, he said.
complain The critics Mascher, the vast majority of the members of the Green League have only learned from the press of the filing of the appeal against the clearance. The members were not involved neither in the decision, yet they had been of the Green League-Brandenburg e. V. according to informed sources said.
in turn, the resulting environmental Association with 30,000 members, mainly in the East of Germany was reflected in a statement on the page Maschers: “Regardless of whether the planned Tesla factory is important and necessary economic stimulus for the Region and the people in Brandenburg and Berlin (and beyond) and as a Symbol of new beginnings in sustainable, post-fossil mobility can be understood, mean large – scale construction and infrastructure projects is always an intervention in nature“, it said on Thursday, in a statement by the Federal sprecherrats of the Green League.
This hot “but not that the Green League building and infrastructure projects in refuse, on principle, or to prevent would – we ask, however, that these are planned from the beginning, always legally correct.”
