The Government is left alone to Llarena before belgian Justice
The Executive is reluctant to guarantee immunity of judge Llarena
The legal profession, he rebukes Justice to defend judge Llarena in Belgium
All associations of judges and prosecutors from Spain, with exception of progressive Judges for Democracy (JpD) and Progressive Union of Prosecutors (UPF), have joined this Friday statement in defense of instructor of cause of ‘procés’ in Supreme Court, Paul Llarena.
This statement, prepared initially by association’s majority –Professional Association of Magistracy (APM), to which belongs judge Llarena – has been signed also by associations of judges Francisco de Vitoria and Forum Independent Judiciary and prosecutors Association of Prosecutors and Association of Professional and Independent Prosecutors.
in Addition, PP will ask explanations to responsible for Interior and Justice about defense of magistrate of Supreme Court. “The Government must defend magistrate who is judging hit to State of pro-independence and should ensure ir security against threats that are suffering. Ask for explanations in Parliament responsible for Justice and home affairs”, said president of PP, Pablo Married, on his Twitter account.
The Government must defend Magistrate who is judging hit to State of pro-independence and should ensure ir security against threats that are suffering. Ask for explanations in Parliament responsible for Justice and home affairs https://t.co/4voNOWoVCb
? Pablo Casado Blanco (@pablocasado_) August 24, 2018
The report prepared by State attorney on how to act before civil lawsuit in Belgium against Llarena, argues that concur with requirements for Spain to be present in procedure without caveats added by Ministry of Justice, that conditions that show terms in which it is admitted claim.
The Ministry of Dolores Delgado announced Thursday that Legal Services of State would defend sovereignty of jurisdiction of Spanish courts to belgian justice, but that “in no case” should be understood as a personal defense of judge of high court by “private acts attributed to him” in lawsuit, which has been promoted by former president of Catalan government, Carles Puigdemont, and four of its former directors.
The investigation for ‘procés’ ask you to convict Llarena to compensate m with one euro in symbolic form for its fairness and used as an argument demonstrations that magistrate of Spanish Supreme Court made after attending a conference in Oviedo in past month of February. At event pointed out that cause for ‘procés’ independence in Catalonia re are “no political prisoners”.
The statement that Government will act “to extent proportionate and appropriate” to protect jurisdictional immunity of Kingdom of Spain, it is understood from various legal fields -among which are companions of Llarena in Professional Association of Magistrates (APM)- from ” ignorance of all of procedural steps or worse, from purpose of doing nothing“, as stated by association of majority of judges in a press release.
As ordering belgian requires that prior to view which resolves on admission or inadmissibility of complaint alleging arguments by various parties, if this procedure is not done at right time Spain will not be able to resist demand, y warn.
If you are not a person, it loses immunity
added To this is that official sources in belgian Government informed Spanish Government that immunity must be invoked before court and advised him to “ensure defence of his immunity in limine litigation before Court of First Instance of Brussels”. If Spain does not present himself before court, this court may consider waiver of its jurisdictional immunity.
he Adds that it is not possible to understand improper advocacy on part of Spanish State Magistrate’s Llarena from legal action in foreign under excuse that y may have cause in views private, which is not even cited, according to association of judges.
Consider that a minimum knowledge of a range of initiatives developed throughout summary drawn up before Supreme Court against plaintiffs escaped evidence without any reservations or hypotical nuances, which “is intended only to disavow, by very diverse means performance of instructor, and through this channel is not pursued, anor thing that banish process itself in its entirety“.
For this reason, MPA urges Ministry of Justice to exercise “a clear and open defence of Spanish jurisdiction, without demur, as those who have been exposed, and that to give effect to measures that have been requested from General Council of Judiciary (CGPJ) to estimate request for relief filed by own Llarena.
on or hand, judges of APM requested General Council of Judiciary (CGPJ) to adopt necessary measures to achieve safe harbor statement he made in defence of independence of Magistrate last week, ensuring your defense is in case of “Government inaction”.
Finally, and in case of not adopted necessary measures to safeguard independence of judiciary and immunity of Spain, APM announces that it will consider adoption of ” appropriate measures to compensate for inaction and interest in debugging criminal responsibilities and administrative that would have been incurred by such passivity”.
googletag.cmd.push(function(){googletag.display(‘div-gpt-ad-espana_n_nata_5b80918f46163f6c6f8b46bd’);});
