The Washington Post announced that they will not endorse any candidate in the upcoming presidential election, breaking a long-standing tradition. According to the Post, the decision was made by the newspaper’s owner, Jeff Bezos, who reportedly interfered with the endorsement of Democratic nominee Kamala Harris over GOP nominee Donald Trump. This move has sparked criticism and disappointment from readers and former staff members.
In a statement, Post publisher Will Lewis explained that the newspaper is returning to its roots of not endorsing presidential candidates. The decision has been met with backlash, with many calling it a cowardly move that undermines the newspaper’s commitment to democratic values. Former editor Marty Baron criticized the decision as a sign of cowardice, with democracy as the casualty.
The Washington Post Guild, the union representing the newspaper’s staff, expressed deep concern over the decision to stop endorsing presidential candidates. The Guild believes that management interfered with the editorial work of its members and is worried about losing readers’ trust as a result. This decision comes just days before a highly consequential election, and many feel that it is important for news organizations to take a stand in such times.
Former Post reporters Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, known for their reporting on the Watergate scandal, expressed disappointment in the decision. They believe that the Post’s own investigative reporting on the dangers of a second Trump presidency should have led to an endorsement of Harris. Post columnist Karen Attiah called the decision an insult to those who have worked to defend human rights and democracy.
In response to the news, Rep. Ted Lieu warned that the free press cowering in fear is the first step towards fascism. The decision not to endorse a candidate has raised concerns about the independence and integrity of the Washington Post under Bezos’ ownership. Despite the backlash, Bezos has not commented on the decision, leaving many to speculate about his motives.
Overall, the Washington Post’s decision not to endorse a candidate has created a stir among readers, staff, and former journalists. The move is seen as a departure from the newspaper’s commitment to democracy and raises questions about the influence of wealthy owners on editorial decisions. As the election draws near, the implications of this decision remain to be seen.
